04-05 YAMAHA YZF R1 REAR BACK WHEEL TIRE HUGGER FENDER 5VY-21650-00-00 BB225

04-05 YAMAHA YZF R1 REAR BACK WHEEL TIRE HUGGER FENDER 5VY-21650-00-00 BB225

Marsoni

M251S

$15.00

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

04-05 YAMAHA YZF R1 REAR BACK WHEEL TIRE HUGGER FENDER 5VY-21650-00-00 BB225bike breakers canada 04 05 YAMAHA YZF R1 REAR BACK WHEEL TIRE HUGGER FENDER 5VY 21650 00 00 BB225 This rear hugger is in great condition with normal wear. The tabs are in tact so it will mount like it should. This item is dirty Removed From: 2005 Yamaha YZF R1 with 30801Km miles Please review all pictures to asses the condition of the item. Shipping We ship nearly all orders within 24 hrs and add tracking numbers to eBay as soon as we ship. If you

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your 04-05 YAMAHA YZF R1 REAR BACK WHEEL TIRE HUGGER FENDER 5VY-21650-00-00 BB225 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your 04-05 YAMAHA YZF R1 REAR BACK WHEEL TIRE HUGGER FENDER 5VY-21650-00-00 BB225 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about 04-05 YAMAHA YZF R1 REAR BACK WHEEL TIRE HUGGER FENDER 5VY-21650-00-00 BB225, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for 04-05 YAMAHA YZF R1 REAR BACK WHEEL TIRE HUGGER FENDER 5VY-21650-00-00 BB225 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

It's a good looking should which is true to size. Quality is good. However, it is not leather. Inner and outer covering are man made. For me, it's okay. I ordered a 9W which I knew would be no more than a triple E width. I'm actually a quadruple E width so it's taking a little longer to break in. I won't be using these as often as at this stage of my life, I don't have that have functions that require dressier shoes. I'm happy with this purchase, a good value for the price. The slip in feature works well like my Sketcher slip in.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 27, 2025

Verified Purchase

Dr. Scott Williams

Birmingham, US

★★★★★ 5

Comfort and Appearance

Size: 9, Color: Black

The shoes were as advertised. Marc Joseph (I hav 4 other pairs) are the perfect shoes for me with my physical needs. Additionally they are exceptionally comfortable and attractive. This pair I returned because they weren’t quite the right fit for me. They are, like my other Marc Joseph shoes, very well made and very attractive.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 19, 2026

Verified Purchase

Francisco G.

Bozeman, US

★★★★★ 5

Premium feel

Size: 10, Color: Black

Very comfortable to wear.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2026

Verified Purchase

Patrick

Alexandria, US

★★★★★ 4

Ok in a pinch. Can get better shoes for the price. Wide aren’t wide

Size: 9 Wide, Color: Black/Black

These were ok comfortable. Would have preferred at the price point to be a little more comfortable. For being a wide size, the shoe was rather tight on my feet. Quality is ok. It passed for the wedding. Would probably have taken more time to pick something different if I had the ability to. This was a last minute purchase.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on December 11, 2025

Verified Purchase

Damone A. Thomas

Waukegan, US

★★★★★ 5

A must have in your shoe collection.

Size: 13, Color: Black

Very comfortable, very stylish, and in my price range gives me exactly what I was looking for in a shoe. Definitely a quality shoe. I’m 6’4, 309 lbs and size 13 shoe.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on July 24, 2025