CK0198 Fits Samsung Evaporator Fan Motor old # DA31-00003N, AP4135449, PS4138269

CK0198 Fits Samsung Evaporator Fan Motor old # DA31-00003N, AP4135449, PS4138269

Marsoni

M251S

$95.14

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

CK0198 Fits Samsung Evaporator Fan Motor old # DA31-00003N, AP4135449, PS4138269Part number: USA6513771 Repair Kit Jumper included for old models Regular price: 127. 58 Availability: In Stock Made by: Samsung Manufacturer's Part Number: old # DA31 00003N use 1da31 00103a9 + Jumpers Description Evaporator Fan Motor USA6513771, For old models You need to use the old haness, replacement old models Replacement Reference and Model Information Part Number DA31 00003N PS4138269, 1515197, B00MRRNXEO, AP4135449 Manufacturer Model Number

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your CK0198 Fits Samsung Evaporator Fan Motor old # DA31-00003N, AP4135449, PS4138269 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your CK0198 Fits Samsung Evaporator Fan Motor old # DA31-00003N, AP4135449, PS4138269 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about CK0198 Fits Samsung Evaporator Fan Motor old # DA31-00003N, AP4135449, PS4138269, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for CK0198 Fits Samsung Evaporator Fan Motor old # DA31-00003N, AP4135449, PS4138269 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

This is a bit large for a travel size jewelry box lol I really thought it was going to be a bit smaller than what it was. I can see why some of the ladies in the comments are saying they’re using it as their main jewelry box since they don’t have much jewelry for a standard sized jewelry box. With that being said, it’s cute and CAN be small enough for travel. It fits a lot and I got this one in particular bc I like that it has a bigger lower compartment for larger pieces. It’s a nice quality travel jewelry box. It’ll fit my needs. But if you have a knack for packing small and you value space. I’d say skip on this one or do due diligence to double check the measurements to see if it’s something you’re okay with packing.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on January 31, 2026

Verified Purchase

Deena M

Waukegan, US

★★★★★ 5

Good value

Color: Jelly Pink, Material Type: Paper, PU

This is a great jewelry box for travel or to just keep at home. Very stylish and holds more than it looks like it would.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 10, 2026

Verified Purchase

Chavely

Waukegan, US

★★★★★ 5

CUTE

Color: Cloud White, Material Type: Paper, PU

I absolutely love this jewelry organizer! The 2-layer design gives it plenty of space without being bulky, making it perfect for travel. I was able to neatly store my earrings, necklaces, rings, and bracelets without anything getting tangled. The interior is soft and protects my jewelry really well, and the compartments are thoughtfully designed to keep everything in place. The compact size fits easily in my suitcase or handbag, which is a huge plus. The cloud white color looks elegant and makes it feel like a great gift option too. Overall, it’s practical, stylish, and very convenient for keeping jewelry organized on the go. Highly

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on April 20, 2026

Verified Purchase

Lisa T.

Louisville, US

★★★★★ 5

I bought myself one and this one was gift for a friend.

Color: Cloud White, Material Type: Paper, PU

Very classy travel jewelry box. Just the size. Made well.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on May 19, 2026