Fettabweisendes Wachspapier 2-Seitig Pfas Free 10+60+10 G/M2 31X38 Cm Weiss Zellulose + Naturwachs (500 Einheit) - Code 270.79

Fettabweisendes Wachspapier 2-Seitig Pfas Free 10+60+10 G/M2 31X38 Cm Weiss Zellulose + Naturwachs (500 Einheit) - Code 270.79

Marsoni

M251S

$33.78

Get it in 3 business days with 1 day shipping. Friday, May 29

Fettabweisendes Wachspapier 2-Seitig Pfas Free 10+60+10 G/M2 31X38 Cm Weiss Zellulose + Naturwachs (500 Einheit) - Code 270.79Das doppelseitige, antibakterielle Wachspapier mit den Maen 31x38 cm ist eine ideale Lsung zum Schutz und zur Prsentation von Lebensmitteln in Bckereien, Cafs, Foodtrucks und Imbissbetrieben. Mit einem Gewicht von 10+60+10 g m besteht es aus Cellulose und ist auf beiden Seiten mit einer pflanzlichen Wachsbeschichtung behandelt, die eine hervorragende Widerstandsfhigkeit gegenber Fett und Feuchtigkeit bietet, und das Eindringen von Flssigkeiten

Easy Shipping

Quick Dispatch:

Your Fettabweisendes Wachspapier 2-Seitig Pfas Free 10+60+10 G/M2 31X38 Cm Weiss Zellulose + Naturwachs (500 Einheit) - Code 270.79 orders ship within 1-2 business days.

Delivery Options:

Standard: 3-7 business days
Fast: 2-3 business days
Express: 1-2 business days

Order Tracking:

You'll receive a tracking link by email once your Fettabweisendes Wachspapier 2-Seitig Pfas Free 10+60+10 G/M2 31X38 Cm Weiss Zellulose + Naturwachs (500 Einheit) - Code 270.79 ships.

Need Help?
Questions about Fettabweisendes Wachspapier 2-Seitig Pfas Free 10+60+10 G/M2 31X38 Cm Weiss Zellulose + Naturwachs (500 Einheit) - Code 270.79, sizing, or delivery? We're just an email away.

Live Shipping Estimates:
Enter your location at checkout to see available shipping methods and costs for Fettabweisendes Wachspapier 2-Seitig Pfas Free 10+60+10 G/M2 31X38 Cm Weiss Zellulose + Naturwachs (500 Einheit) - Code 270.79 in your area.

Get Shipping Estimates

Country Zip/Postal Code

Exchange/Return Notes

We offer a 30-day return/exchange service after receiving.
Final sale items are not eligible for returns or exchanges.
To process your return/exchange, please contact us at [email protected]
Please click here for more details>>> Return & Exchange Policy

I had used the original Xylimelts a few years back for my night time very dry mouth. They worked very well, completely dissolving overnight, but they caused sores inside my cheeks. Recently I discovered this new version which was purported to be made without the offending ingredients. They don't work quite as well, as they don't completely dissolve, but so far haven't caused any irritation. My mouth isn't completely parched as it was without any product, so it is definitely better than nothing. There is a gel-like residue in the morning that needs to be scraped off the teeth. I think Oracoat has some more R & D to do.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on August 25, 2025

Verified Purchase

Mariah O

Lexington, US

★★★★★ 4

These work well!

These work to keep my mouth moist for hours. The only downside is the glue stays in your mouth till you can scrape it out with your finger. I thought it would dissolve but it didn’t. Very grateful to find something that moistens my mouth for so long though. They’re easy to use too. Taste slightly sweet but otherwise I didn’t notice anything.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on October 8, 2024

Verified Purchase

Brad Smith

Phoenix, US

★★★★★ 5

Xylimelts Sensitive

I was sensitive to the regular Xylimelts after a few months use. Painful gums and hives inside my lips and cheeks. The sensitive version immediately corrected the problem and I’ve been using them without issue for nearly a year. The product is a lifesaver for drymouth that occurred when I was sleeping.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on March 28, 2026

Verified Purchase

Whislin ducks

Lowell, US

★★★★★ 5

Best that I have found for dry mouth.

These are the best for dry mouth at night. They mostly stay stuck. I say mostly because I have had a few come apart. I think that was my fault.

WAS THIS REVIEW HELPFUL?YesReportShare

Reviewed in the United States on February 20, 2026